Soft drink availability, contracts, and revenues in American secondary schools

Background: Soft drinks have been widely available in the nation's schools for some years, but recently, in response to rising concern about the epidemic of obesity among youth, concerns have been raised as to whether they should be available, and if so, under what circumstances. This paper looks at how widespread soft drink availability is at present in schools, as well as the availability of other classes of beverages. Because overweight occurs disproportionately among minorities and those of lower socioeconomic status (SES), this paper also seeks to determine to what extent environmental conditions differ for these students. Differences between middle and high schools are also examined.

Methods: Data for 2004 and 2005 were used from two ongoing United States national surveys: the Youth, Education, and Society (YES) study of school administrators (N=345), and the Monitoring the Future (MTF) study of secondary school students in 8th, 10th, and 12th grades surveyed in those same schools (N=37,543). Data were gathered in YES on the availability of various beverages in schools from vending machines and other venues, as well as about the presence and nature of pouring rights contracts with soft drink bottlers. Data were analyzed in 2006.

Results: The vast majority of high school students today have soft drinks available to them in the school environment both through vending machines (88%) and in the cafeteria at lunch (59%), with middle schools providing somewhat less access. Diet soft drinks are less available, particularly at lunch. Most students (67% in middle and 83% in high school) are in schools that have a contract with a bottler. Revenues to schools generated by soft drink sales are quite modest. Hispanics are most likely to have soft drinks available throughout the school day. The SES of the students correlates negatively with whether the school allows advertising and promotion of soft drinks.

Conclusions: Current school practices regarding soft drink availability, advertising, and sales would seem likely to be contributing to the extent of overweight among American young people, and to some extent to the higher risk faced by Hispanic and lower SES youth.

Similar articles

Delva J, O'Malley PM, Johnston LD. Delva J, et al. Am J Prev Med. 2007 Oct;33(4 Suppl):S226-39. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.018. Am J Prev Med. 2007. PMID: 17884570

Hendel-Paterson M, French SA, Story M. Hendel-Paterson M, et al. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004 Oct;104(10):1597-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2004.07.003. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004. PMID: 15389421

Nickelson J, Roseman MG, Forthofer MS. Nickelson J, et al. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010 Mar-Apr;42(2):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2009.02.005. Epub 2010 Jan 25. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010. PMID: 20097614

Opalinski A. Opalinski A. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2006 Oct;11(4):234-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2006.00075.x. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2006. PMID: 16999745 Review.

Nestle M. Nestle M. Public Health Rep. 2000 Jul-Aug;115(4):308-19. doi: 10.1093/phr/115.4.308. Public Health Rep. 2000. PMID: 11059423 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

Lemmon B, Montuclard A, Solar SE, Roberts E, Joo TW, Falbe J. Lemmon B, et al. AJPM Focus. 2024 Jan 9;3(2):100190. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100190. eCollection 2024 Apr. AJPM Focus. 2024. PMID: 38357553 Free PMC article.

Ogum-Alangea D, Aryeetey RNO, Gray HL, Laar AK, Adanu RMK. Ogum-Alangea D, et al. PLoS One. 2020 Sep 1;15(9):e0238308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238308. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32870945 Free PMC article.

Potvin Kent M, Velazquez CE, Pauzé E, Cheng-Boivin O, Berfeld N. Potvin Kent M, et al. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6441-x. BMC Public Health. 2019. PMID: 30691422 Free PMC article.

Momin SR, Wood AC. Momin SR, et al. Curr Nutr Rep. 2018 Dec;7(4):286-293. doi: 10.1007/s13668-018-0249-7. Curr Nutr Rep. 2018. PMID: 30284177 Review.

Velazquez CE, Black JL, Potvin Kent M. Velazquez CE, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 12;14(9):1054. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091054. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28895921 Free PMC article. Review.